Home | 1001portails | 1001annonces

linux.debian.policy     [Liste des Groupes]   refresh

[1] [2] [3] [4]

Date Sujet  Auteur
24.11.
o Bug#975637: debian-policy: deprecate Rules-Requires-Root other than "no", "binar
24.11.
o Bug#975631: debian-policy: window manager: remove reference to Debian menu
19.11.
* Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
21.11.
+* Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
21.11.
|`* Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
25.11.
| +* Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
25.11.
| |`- Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
22.11.
| `* Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
22.11.
|  `- Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
19.11.
+- Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
19.11.
`* Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
20.11.
 `- Bug#975250: clarify gathering together of copyright information
16.11.
o Bug#974911: debian-policy: Date in documentation varies with timezone
31.10.
o Bug#973491: debian-policy: ch-opersys refers to wrong manpage section for system
12.10.
* Bug#971977: debian-policy: debian/changelog date syntax description inconsistent
15.10.
`- Bug#971977: debian-policy: debian/changelog date syntax description inconsistent
26.09.
* Bug#971023: Version field (5.6.12) and colons
29.09.
`- Bug#971023: Version field (5.6.12) and colons
13.09.
* Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
12.10.
+- Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
12.10.
`* Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
13.10.
 +* Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
13.10.
 |`* Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
13.10.
 | `- Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
12.10.
 `* Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
13.10.
  `- Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"
19.08.
o Bug#968664: debian-policy: recommends an old version of libjs-sphinxdoc, again a
11.08.
* Bug#968226: Build-Depends-If-Available
14.08.
`- Bug#968226: Build-Depends-If-Available
04.08.
* Bug#967857: debian-policy: [Files/Permissions and owners] files installed by pac
04.08.
`- Bug#967857: debian-policy: [Files/Permissions and owners] files installed by pac
04.08.
o Bug#967428: debian-policy: Abstract of Debian Manifesto (doc ID debian-manifesto
01.07.
o Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
24.06.
* Bug#963524: dpkg: source-only *.changes files lack two mandatory fields
24.06.
`- Bug#963524: dpkg: source-only *.changes files lack two mandatory fields
17.06.
o Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
16.06.
o Bug#953629: Bug#953554: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packages
11.06.
* Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
12.06.
+* Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
30.06.
|+* Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
30.06.
||`* Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
30.06.
|| `- Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
12.06.
|`- Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
12.06.
+- Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
11.06.
`- Bug#953629: debian-policy: Please permit Debian revisions with 1.0 native packag
05.06.
* Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322
05.06.
+- Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322
05.06.
+- Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322
05.06.
`* Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322
05.06.
 `- Bug#962277: debian-policy: Maintainer address: move away from RFC822 to RFC5322
02.06.
o Bug#962011: developers-reference: dead link to policy in beyond-pkging
23.05.
o Bug#961294: Allow derivatives to define parent project fields
18.05.
o Bug#960926: developers-reference: updating the packages copyright notices
07.05.
o Bug#959909: debian-policy: complete implementation of ctte decision to forbid ve
28.04.
o Bug#959005: debian-policy: recommends an old version of libjs-sphinxdoc, once ag
15.04.
* Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packa
15.04.
`- Bug#956818: developers-reference: contradictory information about removing packa
09.04.
o Bug#908155: Bug #908155 in developers-reference marked as pending
08.04.
* Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
10.04.
`- Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
01.04.
* Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
01.04.
`- Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
27.03.
o Bug#955083: debian-policy: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex errors
27.03.
o Bug#955094: developers-reference: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: latex errors
27.03.
o Bug#955036: "convenience copies" should be named "embedded code copies"
26.03.
o Bug#955005: Relax requirements to copy copyright notices into d/copyright
23.03.
* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
17.11.
+- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
16.11.
+- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
15.10.
+* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
18.10.
|+* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
16.11.
||+- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
18.10.
||`- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
18.10.
|`- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
30.09.
+* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
30.09.
|`* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
08.10.
| +* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
08.10.
| |`- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
01.10.
| `* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
16.11.
|  `- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
30.09.
+- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
01.04.
+* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
01.04.
|`* Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
01.04.
| `- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
23.03.
`- Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential
14.03.
* Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog
14.03.
+* Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog
15.03.
|`* Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog
15.03.
| `- Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog
14.03.
+- Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog
14.03.
`- Bug#953911: debian-policy: clarify documentation of "Closes: #NNNNNN" changelog
13.03.
o Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build
09.02.
* Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via anothe
09.04.
+- Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via anothe
09.04.
+- Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via anothe
14.02.
+- Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via anothe
10.02.
`* Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via anothe
14.02.
 +- Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via anothe
12.02.
 `- Bug#950994: Discourage package in contrib to install the real program via anothe
01.02.
o Bug#950440: debian-policy: Confusing conflation of Essential:yes w/ Priority:req
23.01.
* Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the packag
24.01.
+- Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the packag
23.01.
`* Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the packag
24.01.
 +- Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the packag
23.01.
 `- Bug#949690: debian-policy: "service unit should have the same name as the packag
20.01.
o Bug#949390: Newly created package usernames should begin with an underscore
20.01.
* Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build
20.01.
`* Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build
21.01.
 `- Bug#940144: developers-reference: document self-service givebacks in wanna-build
19.01.
o Bug#949258: debian-policy: Support negated architecture specifications in debian
15.01.
* Bug#949007: debian-policy: Typo in example
16.01.
+- Bug#949007: debian-policy: Typo in example
16.01.
`- Bug#949007: debian-policy: Typo in example
15.01.
* Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules
16.01.
+* Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules
16.01.
|`- Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules
16.01.
`- Bug#949006: debian-policy: Stop recommending stamp files in debian/rules
06.01.
* Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant?
06.01.
+- Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant?
06.01.
`* Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant?
07.01.
 `* Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant?
07.01.
  `- Bug#948275: is Debian POSIX compliant?
04.01.
* Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result
05.01.
+* Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result
05.01.
|`- Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result
05.01.
+- Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result
04.01.
`* Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result
04.01.
 `- Bug#948115: Revise init script Policy based on GR result
04.01.
* Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements
26.01.
+* Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements
30.01.
|`* Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements
01.03.
| `- Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements
04.01.
`* Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements
04.01.
 `- Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements
04.01.
o Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements
03.01.
o Bug#941803: debian-policy: dependencies on font packages
04.12.
* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
`* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
 `* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
  +- Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
  `* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
   +* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
   |`* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
09.12.
   | `* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
09.12.
   |  `- Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
   `* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
    `* Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
08.12.
     `- Bug#941198: In support of mandatory unit files
01.12.
* Bug#941198: please postpone until after the GR
02.12.
+* Bug#941198: please postpone until after the GR
02.12.
|`- Bug#941198: please postpone until after the GR
01.12.
`- Bug#941198: please postpone until after the GR
29.11.
* Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directori
29.11.
`* Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directori
01.12.
 `- Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directori

[1] [2] [3] [4]

   
Add to My Google
My yahoo !
Add to Netvibes