Home | 1001portails | 1001annonces

linux.debian.devel.qa     [Liste des Groupes]   refresh

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Date Sujet  Auteur
20.11.
o Bug#975247: tracker.debian.org: displays deleted source package, when current bi
16.11.
* Bug#961764: #961764: texi2html: texi2html embeds User and Date information in ge
16.11.
`- Bug#961764: #961764: texi2html: texi2html embeds User and Date information in ge
11.11.
* Bug#974344: don't display "Debci reports failed tests" for outdated package vers
12.11.
`- Bug#974344: don't display "Debci reports failed tests" for outdated package vers
28.10.
* Bug#973277: tracker.debian.org: Please provide the relevant links to debcheck
28.10.
+- Bug#973277: tracker.debian.org: Please provide the relevant links to debcheck
28.10.
`- Processed: Re: Bug#973277: tracker.debian.org: Please provide the relevant link
20.10.
* Bug#972560: qa.debian.org/popcon: "INF%", "NaN%"
20.10.
+- Bug#972560: marked as done (qa.debian.org/popcon: "INF%", "NaN%")
20.10.
`- Bug#972560: qa.debian.org/popcon: "INF%", "NaN%"
28.09.
o Bug#932431: marked as done (DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default, a
28.09.
o Processed: retitle 932431 to DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default,
28.09.
o Processed: Re: Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still sh
27.09.
o Processed: tagging 932431
27.09.
o Processed: Re: Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still sh
26.09.
* Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO colu
27.09.
`* Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO colu
27.09.
 `* Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO colu
27.09.
  `* Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO colu
28.09.
   `* Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO colu
28.09.
    `- Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO colu
17.09.
o Bug#970499: qa.debian.org/dose/file-overwrites.html: broken link to /dose/doc.ht
14.09.
* Bug#970321: tracker should display related ITS bugs
14.09.
`- Bug#970321: tracker should display related ITS bugs
31.08.
o Processed: Re: UDD: please install pg_stat_statements extension
31.08.
* Bug#969311: UDD: please install pg_stat_statements extension
31.08.
`* Bug#969311: UDD: please install pg_stat_statements extension
31.08.
 `- Processed: Re: UDD: please install pg_stat_statements extension
26.08.
o Bug#931601: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: Please update debian-repositori
14.08.
* debian/upstream/metadata: next steps
15.08.
`* Re: debian/upstream/metadata: next steps
16.08.
 +- Re: debian/upstream/metadata: next steps
15.08.
 `- Re: debian/upstream/metadata: next steps
11.08.
o Bug#968227: UDD/bugs: bad encoding of non-ASCII bug titles
05.08.
* Bug#967086: Empty pages when authenticated
06.08.
`* Bug#967086: Empty pages when authenticated
06.08.
 `* Bug#967086: Empty pages when authenticated
06.08.
  `- Bug#967086: Empty pages when authenticated
02.08.
* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
02.08.
`* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
02.08.
 `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
03.08.
  `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
03.08.
   `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
03.08.
    `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
03.08.
     `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
12.08.
      `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
13.08.
       `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
14.08.
        `* Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
15.08.
         `- Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
01.08.
* Bug#966297: UDD: mentors.debian.net schema change
16.08.
`* Bug#966297: UDD: mentors.debian.net schema change
06.09.
 `- Bug#966297: UDD: mentors.debian.net schema change
01.08.
* Bug#966649: UDD: 'upload_history' importer broken; needs porting to Python3
27.08.
+- Bug#966649: marked as done (UDD: 'upload_history' importer broken; needs portin
26.08.
+- Bug#966649: Unfortunately there are several Uploads missing (Was: upload_history
26.08.
+- Processed: Unfortunately there are several Uploads missing (Was: upload_history
23.08.
+- Bug#966649: Merge request for minimal, tested Python 3 port
23.08.
+- Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation
21.08.
+- Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation
21.08.
+- Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation
20.08.
+- Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation
20.08.
+- Bug#966649: Request for feedback on upload_history re-implementation
12.08.
`- Bug#966649: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty
24.07.
o Bug#961221: broken lintian report link on packages overview
23.07.
o Hello Pal,
21.07.
o Re: I would love to volunteer with the team
09.07.
o Ahoj/Hello
07.07.
* Bug#964488: UDD: browse upstream versions
08.07.
`- Bug#964488: UDD: browse upstream versions
05.07.
* Bug#964280: DDPO: lintian links no longer work
06.07.
`- Bug#964280: marked as done (DDPO: lintian links no longer work)
29.06.
o Processed: reopening 708772
28.06.
o Bug#928942: marked as done (udd: cannot import current dump due to matview ref
28.06.
o Processed: closing 583489
28.06.
o Bug#583489: qa.debian.org: Please provide 1.0 (explicit) and 1.0 (implicit) info
28.06.
o Processed: Re: Bug#583489: qa.debian.org: Please provide 1.0 (explicit) and 1.0
28.06.
o Bug#708772: marked as done (improve the integration between debtags and the PTS
28.06.
o Processed: retitle 836830 to UDD/upload-history: please also save uploads to ba
28.06.
o Processed: your mail
28.06.
o Processed: retitle 884135 to UDD/upstream: should honor comment-only watch file
28.06.
* Bug#963903: 'ftpnew-blends' importer crashing. disabled.
29.06.
+- Bug#963903: marked as done ('ftpnew-blends' importer crashing. disabled.)
29.06.
+- Processed: Re: Bug#963903: 'ftpnew-blends' importer crashing. disabled.
29.06.
`- Bug#963903: 'ftpnew-blends' importer crashing. disabled.
28.06.
* Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
30.06.
+- Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
28.06.
`* Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
29.06.
 `* Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
29.06.
  `* Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
03.07.
   +- Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
29.06.
   `* Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
30.06.
    `- Bug#963887: UDD: 'duck' importer broken since 2020-05-25
28.06.
o Bug#963879: UDD: 'lintian' importer broken since 2020-04-18
25.06.
* Issues with UDD importer [Was: Cron <udd@ullmann> /srv/udd.debian.org/udd/rudd
25.06.
`- Re: Issues with UDD importer [Was: Cron <udd@ullmann> /srv/udd.debian.org/udd/rudd
23.06.
* Bug#963526: DDPO: Watch column is empty
23.06.
`* Bug#963526: DDPO: Watch column is empty
23.06.
 `- Bug#963526: DDPO: Watch column is empty
15.06.
o Désinfectants
02.06.
o Processed: closing 962000
01.06.
* Bug#962000: Duplicated news for php-horde-image
02.06.
+- Processed: Re: Bug#962000: Duplicated news for php-horde-image
02.06.
+- Bug#962000: Duplicated news for php-horde-image
02.06.
`- Bug#962000: marked as done (Duplicated news for php-horde-image)
25.05.
o Processed: closing 959762
25.05.
o Processed: UDD/dmd: fails to load when debci data is missing
23.05.
* debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
23.05.
`* Re: debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
24.05.
 +* Re: debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
24.05.
 |`* Re: debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
26.05.
 | `* Re: debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
27.05.
 |  `- Re: debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
23.05.
 `- Re: debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
21.05.
o Bug#667593: exists elsewhere Re: debcheck: check for obsolete transitional packa
21.05.
o Bug#708060: debcheck: :$arch and :native always appear broken
21.05.
o Processed: debcheck: :$arch and :native always appear broken
21.05.
o Bug#844750: fixed? Re: should link to tracker.d.o instead of packages.qa.d.o
21.05.
o Processed: user qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org, usertagging 961221, affects
21.05.
o Bug#816448: debcheck: Does not support build-profiles
21.05.
o Processed: Re: debcheck: Does not support build-profiles
17.05.
o Processed: retitle 959762 to UDD/dmd: fails to load large page, user qa.debian.
12.05.
o Bug#960387: UDD/bugs: doesn't show RM hint if the RM bug is tagged pending
11.05.
o Processed: reassign 959762 to qa.debian.org, forcibly merging 959931 959762
11.05.
o Processed (with 1 error): forcibly merging 959931 959762
10.05.
o Processed: severity of 959931 is important
10.05.
o Processed: Re: Bug#960154: UDD table no longer populated
07.05.
* Bug#959931: qa.debian.org: udd.debian.org/dmd no more able to display HTML repor
25.05.
+- Bug#959931: qa.debian.org: udd.debian.org/dmd no more able to display HTML repor
13.05.
`* Bug#959931: qa.debian.org: udd.debian.org/dmd no more able to display HTML repor
13.05.
 `* Bug#959931: qa.debian.org: udd.debian.org/dmd no more able to display HTML repor
13.05.
  `- Bug#959931: qa.debian.org: udd.debian.org/dmd no more able to display HTML repor
30.04.
o Processed: Re: Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Re
30.04.
* Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Sa
30.04.
+- Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Sa
30.04.
+- Processed: Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read U
30.04.
+- Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "
30.04.
+- Processed: Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read U
30.04.
`- Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Sa
28.04.
* Bug#959024: Problems with uscan'ing on github from tracker.debian.org
28.04.
+- Processed: Re: Bug#959024: Problems with uscan'ing on github from tracker.debia
28.04.
+- Bug#959024: Problems with uscan'ing on github from tracker.debian.org
28.04.
`- Processed: Re: Bug#959024: Problems with uscan'ing on github from tracker.debia
20.04.
o Bug#818382: tracker.debian.org: False positive: "Problems while searching for ne
13.04.
* Bug#956590: tracker.debian.org: provide excuse for not migrating to testing
13.04.
`- Processed: Re: Bug#956590: tracker.debian.org: provide excuse for not migrating
05.04.
* New maintainership and location for html2text
05.04.
`- Bug#955868: html2text: Please migrate to new upstream project location
01.04.
* [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
02.04.
`* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
05.04.
 `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
05.04.
  `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
08.04.
   `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
09.04.
    `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
09.04.
     +* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
10.04.
     |`* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
11.04.
     | `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
13.04.
     |  `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
14.04.
     |   `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
28.04.
     |    `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
01.05.
     |     `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
02.05.
     |      `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
02.05.
     |       +- Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
02.05.
     |       `- Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
09.04.
     `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
15.04.
      `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
16.04.
       `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
16.04.
        `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
16.04.
         +- Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
16.04.
         `* Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
16.04.
          `- Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
01.04.
* [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
13.04.
`* Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
14.04.
 `* Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
13.05.
  `* Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
13.05.
   `* Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
13.05.
    `* Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
14.05.
     `* Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to
15.05.
      `* Re: Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to
18.05.
       `* Re: Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to
18.05.
        `- Re: Started porting UDD to Python3 (Was: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to
01.04.
o Bug#955459: PTS: please support new FTP Masters ACCEPTED emails sender/signed-by
01.04.
o Bug#955434: tracker.d.o: please integrate information from buildinfos.debian.net
31.03.
o Processed: Re: Bug#955339: tracker.debian.org: improper bounce-process
30.03.
* Bug#955339: tracker.debian.org: improper bounce-process
30.03.
`* Bug#955339: tracker.debian.org: improper bounce-process
31.03.
 `- Bug#955339: tracker.debian.org: improper bounce-process
30.03.
o Bug#955213: Version information on tracker.d.o in many cases wrong
30.03.
o Processed: Re: Bug#955213: Version information on tracker.d.o in many cases wro
29.03.
* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
01.05.
+* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
02.05.
|`- Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
24.04.
+* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
24.04.
|`* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
24.04.
| `* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
25.04.
|  +- Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
24.04.
|  `- Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
29.03.
`* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
29.03.
 `* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
29.03.
  +- Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
29.03.
  `* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
29.03.
   `* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
30.03.
    `* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
30.03.
     `* Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
30.03.
      `- Bug#955268: udd watch: "429 too many requests" from GitHub
28.03.
o Bug#955213: Tracker shows for berkshelf package a version in unstable altough th
05.03.
o qa.debian.org can't show graphs
26.02.
o Bug#756742: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: Package translation status info
25.02.
o Bug#952523: udd/autoremovals.cgi: please allow inspecting the dependency chain t
25.02.
o Bug#952522: udd/autoremovals.cgi: please make it clear that the packages in "dep
25.02.
* Bug#952521: udd/autoremovals.cgi: please add path to sources
25.02.
`- Bug#952521: marked as done (udd/autoremovals.cgi: please add path to sources)
24.02.
* Re: a tiny contribution to Debian QA work?
25.02.
`* Re: a tiny contribution to Debian QA work?
25.02.
 +- Re: a tiny contribution to Debian QA work?
25.02.
 `* Re: a tiny contribution to Debian QA work?
26.02.
  `* Re: a tiny contribution to Debian QA work?
27.02.
   `- Re: a tiny contribution to Debian QA work?
24.02.
o Processed: reassign 951439 to www.debian.org
24.02.
o Processed: reassign 951444 to www.debian.org
23.02.
* Re: distro-tracker quick-setup failed
24.02.
`- Re: distro-tracker quick-setup failed
22.02.
o Processing of html2text_1.3.2a-25_source.changes
16.02.
o Processed: reassign
31.01.
* Bug#950327: tracker.debian.org: do not use "From" address from upload announceme
27.02.
`- Bug#950327: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: do not use "From" address from
24.01.
* Bug#949716: qa.debian.org: DDPO doesn't show packages with version 0
24.01.
`- Bug#949716: qa.debian.org: DDPO doesn't show packages with version 0
21.01.
* Re: duck.debian.net down
28.01.
`* Re: duck.debian.net down
28.01.
 `- Re: duck.debian.net down
16.01.
o Bug#949009: duck table is not very useful
11.01.
* Bug#948672: qa.debian.org: popcon-graph the graph does not show information late
13.01.
`- Bug#948672: marked as done (qa.debian.org: popcon-graph the graph does not show
25.12.
o Re: Inquiries about cflow package maintenance
18.12.
* Bug#932296: qa.debian.org: getwatch filling up /tmp
16.06.
`* Bug#932296: qa.debian.org: getwatch filling up /tmp
17.06.
 `* Bug#932296: qa.debian.org: getwatch filling up /tmp
17.06.
  `- Bug#932296: qa.debian.org: getwatch filling up /tmp
18.12.
o Processed: Re: Bug#932296: qa.debian.org: getwatch filling up /tmp
17.12.
o Bug#717834: marked as done (Fwd: Kill DEHS)
16.12.
o Bug#816449: marked as done (debcheck: Lists missing Standards-Version for udebs
16.12.
o Bug#945112: marked as done (debcheck: handle debhelper-compat)
15.12.
o Bug#872646: qa.debian.org: [debcheck] Escape some HTML before outputting
15.12.
o Bug#816449: debcheck: Lists missing Standards-Version for udebs
15.12.
o Processed: forcibly merging 872646 945941
15.12.
* Bug#945112: debcheck: handle debhelper-compat
15.12.
`* Bug#945112: debcheck: handle debhelper-compat
15.12.
 `- Bug#945112: debcheck: handle debhelper-compat
14.12.
o Bug#816450: marked as done (debcheck: Lists packages depending on libraries wit
14.12.
o Bug#816450: debcheck: Lists packages depending on libraries with lower priority
05.12.
o Re: http://upstream-metadata.debian.net/ shows stock web page
03.12.
* Re: DEP12: debian/upstream/metdata doesn't allow specifying the VCS branch
17.01.
`- Re: DEP12: debian/upstream/metdata doesn't allow specifying the VCS branch
03.12.
o Bug#946024: vcswatch: track last commit sha
01.12.
* Bug#945941: Lacking HTML encoding of debcheck results
16.12.
`- Bug#945941: marked as done (Lacking HTML encoding of debcheck results)

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

   
Add to My Google
My yahoo !
Add to Netvibes