Home | 1001portails | 1001annonces

comp.lang.awk     [Liste des Groupes]   refresh

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]

Date Sujet  Auteur
20.09.
* Looking for a sed group
20.09.
`* Re: Looking for a sed group
20.09.
 `* Re: Looking for a sed group
20.09.
  `- [OT] Leraning sed? (was Re: Looking for a sed group)
19.09.
* Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
19.09.
+* Re: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
19.09.
|`* Re: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
19.09.
| `* Re: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
19.09.
|  `- Cygwin (Was: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?)
19.09.
`* Re: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
19.09.
 `* Re: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
19.09.
  `* Re: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
19.09.
   `- Re: Looking for GAWK for Windows - what does the group think is best?
20.08.
* While in whie doesn't work
20.08.
`* Re: While in whie doesn't work
20.08.
 `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
21.08.
  `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
22.08.
   `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
22.08.
    `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
06.09.
     `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
07.09.
      `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
07.09.
       `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
08.09.
        +- Re: While in whie doesn't work
07.09.
        `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
07.09.
         `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
07.09.
          `* Re: While in whie doesn't work
09.09.
           `* [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
09.09.
            `* Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
09.09.
             `* Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
09.09.
              `* Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
10.09.
               +* Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
10.09.
               |`* Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
11.09.
               | `- Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
10.09.
               `* Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
10.09.
                `- Re: [OT] Shells for programming (was Re: While in whie doesn't work)
19.08.
* Different results with same code
19.08.
`* Re: Different results with same code
19.08.
 `* Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
  +- Re: Different results with same code
19.08.
  `* Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
   `* Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
    +* Re: Different results with same code
19.08.
    |`* Re: Different results with same code
21.08.
    | +* Re: Different results with same code
21.08.
    | |`* Re: Different results with same code
21.08.
    | | `* Re: Different results with same code
21.08.
    | |  +* Re: Different results with same code
21.08.
    | |  |`- Re: Different results with same code
21.08.
    | |  `* Re: Different results with same code
21.08.
    | |   `- Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
    | `- Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
    +- Re: Different results with same code
19.08.
    `* Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
     `* Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
      +- Re: Different results with same code
20.08.
      `- Re: Different results with same code
15.08.
* Strange error message from GAWK
15.08.
+* Re: Strange error message from GAWK
15.08.
|`* Re: Strange error message from GAWK
16.08.
| `- Re: Strange error message from GAWK
15.08.
`* Re: Strange error message from GAWK
15.08.
 `- Re: Strange error message from GAWK
13.08.
* does field splitting happen when no fields are used
14.08.
+- Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
14.08.
+- Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
14.08.
+- Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
13.08.
`* Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
14.08.
 `* Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
14.08.
  +- Does it ever? (Was: does field splitting happen when no fields are used)
14.08.
  +- Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
14.08.
  `* Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
14.08.
   `- Re: does field splitting happen when no fields are used
12.08.
o DATA ENTRY JOB
10.07.
* Count bytes instead of characters
10.07.
+- Re: Count bytes instead of characters
10.07.
`- Re: Count bytes instead of characters
03.07.
* find replace text ... sequence
03.07.
+* Re: find replace text ... sequence
03.07.
|`- Re: find replace text ... sequence
03.07.
`* Re: find replace text ... sequence
03.07.
 `- Re: find replace text ... sequence
25.06.
* convert data in differnt measure unit
25.06.
`* Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
25.06.
 `* Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
25.06.
  `* Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
25.06.
   `* Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
27.06.
    `* Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
28.06.
     +- Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
28.06.
     `* Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
28.06.
      `* Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
29.06.
       `- Re: convert data in differnt measure unit
15.06.
* want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
01.08.
+* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
01.08.
|`* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| +* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
01.08.
| |`* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | +* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | |+* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | ||`- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | |+- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | |+* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | ||+* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | |||`- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | ||`- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | |`* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | | `* Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | |  `- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
02.08.
| | `- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
01.08.
| `- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
16.06.
+- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
16.06.
`- Re: want a better test for strings holding numbers than "if(x==x+0)"
15.06.
* Index (bug?)
15.06.
`- Re: Index (bug?)
13.06.
* A broadcasting server with GNU Awk TCP/UDP networking?
14.06.
`* Re: A broadcasting server with GNU Awk TCP/UDP networking?
14.06.
 `* Re: A broadcasting server with GNU Awk TCP/UDP networking?
14.06.
  `* Re: A broadcasting server with GNU Awk TCP/UDP networking?
15.06.
   `* Re: A broadcasting server with GNU Awk TCP/UDP networking?
15.06.
    `* Re: A broadcasting server with GNU Awk TCP/UDP networking?
15.06.
     `* Re: A broadcasting server with GNU Awk TCP/UDP networking?
16.06.
      `* Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
       +- Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
       `* Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
17.06.
        +- Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
        +* Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
        |`* Re: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
17.06.
        | `* Re: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
18.06.
        |  `* Re: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
19.06.
        |   `* Re: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
20.06.
        |    +* Re: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
20.06.
        |    |`* NONFATAL... (Was: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
21.06.
        |    | `- Re: NONFATAL... (Was: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
19.06.
        |    `* Re: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
19.06.
        |     `- Re: gawk support for a TCP server with multiple concurrent clients
16.06.
        `* Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
         `* Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
          `* Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
           `* Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface) (Was: A broadc
16.06.
            `- Re: Breaking existing code (users of the existing GAWK TCP interface)
13.06.
* Seeking Ed Morton + Janis Papanagnou
14.06.
+- Re: Seeking Ed Morton + Janis Papanagnou
13.06.
`- Re: Seeking Ed Morton + Janis Papanagnou
10.06.
* When is ARGC incremented in ARGV[ARGC++]="foo"?
10.06.
+- Re: When is ARGC incremented in ARGV[ARGC++]="foo"?
10.06.
+* Re: When is ARGC incremented in ARGV[ARGC++]="foo"?
11.06.
|`* Re: When is ARGC incremented in ARGV[ARGC++]="foo"?
11.06.
| `- Re: When is ARGC incremented in ARGV[ARGC++]="foo"?
10.06.
`- Re: When is ARGC incremented in ARGV[ARGC++]="foo"?
30.05.
* interpreting a strongly typed regexp constant variable as literal regular expres
30.05.
+- Re: interpreting a strongly typed regexp constant variable as literal regular expres
30.05.
`- Re: interpreting a strongly typed regexp constant variable as literal regular expres
23.05.
* PROCINFO, "pty"
23.05.
+- Re: PROCINFO, "pty"
23.05.
`* Re: PROCINFO, "pty"
23.05.
 `- Re: PROCINFO, "pty"
23.05.
o anyone got an elegant way to connect travis and awk?
22.05.
* anyone using namespaces from gawk 5?
23.05.
`* Re: anyone using namespaces from gawk 5?
23.05.
 `* Re: anyone using namespaces from gawk 5?
23.05.
  `* Re: anyone using namespaces from gawk 5?
23.05.
   `* Re: anyone using namespaces from gawk 5?
23.05.
    `- Re: anyone using namespaces from gawk 5?
18.05.
o tp text processor in awk
18.05.
* Gawk optimizations in string operations
18.05.
`* Re: Gawk optimizations in string operations
18.05.
 `* Re: Gawk optimizations in string operations
19.05.
  `- Re: Gawk optimizations in string operations
17.05.
* Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
18.05.
+* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
18.05.
|+* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
19.05.
||+* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
19.05.
|||`* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
19.05.
||| +- Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
19.05.
||| `- Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
18.05.
||`* Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
19.05.
|| +* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
19.05.
|| |`* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
20.05.
|| | +* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
20.05.
|| | |+* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
22.05.
|| | ||+* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
22.05.
|| | |||+* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
23.05.
|| | ||||+* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
24.05.
|| | |||||`* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
24.05.
|| | ||||| `* The debugger (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specif
24.05.
|| | |||||  `* Re: The debugger (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specif
24.05.
|| | |||||   +* Re: The debugger (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specif
24.05.
|| | |||||   |`* Re: The debugger (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specif
24.05.
|| | |||||   | `- Re: The debugger (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specif
24.05.
|| | |||||   `- Re: The debugger (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specif
23.05.
|| | ||||`* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
24.05.
|| | |||| `* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
25.05.
|| | ||||  `* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
26.05.
|| | ||||   `* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
26.05.
|| | ||||    `* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
26.05.
|| | ||||     `* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
26.05.
|| | ||||      `* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
31.05.
|| | ||||       `* Deep copy of array (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk
01.06.
|| | ||||        +* Re: Deep copy of array
01.06.
|| | ||||        |`* Re: Deep copy of array
02.06.
|| | ||||        | +* Re: Deep copy of array
02.06.
|| | ||||        | |`* Re: Deep copy of array
02.06.
|| | ||||        | | `* Re: Deep copy of array
02.06.
|| | ||||        | |  `* Totally missing the point for $400, Alex (Was: Deep copy of array)
03.06.
|| | ||||        | |   `- Re: Totally missing the point for $400, Alex (Was: Deep copy of array)
01.06.
|| | ||||        | `* Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |  `* Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |   `* Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |    +- Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |    +- Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |    `* Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |     +* Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |     |`- Re: Deep copy of array
03.06.
|| | ||||        |     `- Re: Deep copy of array
31.05.
|| | ||||        `- Re: Deep copy of array (Was: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk
22.05.
|| | |||`- Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
21.05.
|| | ||`- Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
20.05.
|| | |`* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
21.05.
|| | | `- Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
19.05.
|| | +* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
20.05.
|| | |+- Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
20.05.
|| | |`- Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
19.05.
|| | `* Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
19.05.
|| |  `- Re: Why? (Was: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific])
19.05.
|| `* Re: Why?
19.05.
||  `- Re: Why?
18.05.
|`* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
18.05.
| `* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
18.05.
|  `- Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
+- Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
+* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
|`- Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
`* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
 +- Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
 `* Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
  `- Re: Creating a new variable from a string [gawk specific]
17.05.
* rot13'ing in (G)AWK
17.05.
+* Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
17.05.
|`* Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
17.05.
| +* Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
19.05.
| |+* Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
19.05.
| ||`- Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
18.05.
| |`* Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
18.05.
| | `* Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
18.05.
| |  `- Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
17.05.
| +- Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
17.05.
| `- a fairy tale.... [Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK]
17.05.
+- Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
17.05.
`- Re: rot13'ing in (G)AWK
12.05.
* A bit of ancient history (fixing GAWK so that it handles missing files)
12.05.
`- Re: A bit of ancient history (fixing GAWK so that it handles missing files)
12.05.
* Awk Fatal error
12.05.
+* Re: Awk Fatal error
12.05.
|`- Re: Awk Fatal error
12.05.
`- Re: Awk Fatal error
11.05.
o Re: TAWK lives...?
03.05.
* space beetwen data
03.05.
+- Re: space beetwen data
03.05.
+- Re: space beetwen data
03.05.
`* Re: space beetwen data
03.05.
 `- Re: space beetwen data
19.04.
* resplit?
20.04.
+- Re: resplit?
19.04.
+* Re: resplit?
19.04.
|`- Re: resplit?
19.04.
+- Re: resplit?
19.04.
`* Re: resplit?
20.04.
 `- Re: resplit?
14.04.
* Gawk 5.1.0 released
23.05.
+* Re: Gawk 5.1.0 released
23.05.
|`- Re: Gawk 5.1.0 released
14.04.
`* Re: Gawk 5.1.0 released
16.04.
 `* Re: Gawk 5.1.0 released
16.04.
  `* Re: Gawk 5.1.0 released
16.04.
   `- Re: Gawk 5.1.0 released
13.04.
* fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
13.04.
`* Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
13.04.
 `* Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
14.04.
  +- Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
13.04.
  +- Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
13.04.
  `* Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
14.04.
   +- Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
13.04.
   +- Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
13.04.
   `- Re: fatal: attempt to use scalar as an array
12.04.
* GNU awk TCP/UDP networking
13.04.
+* Re: GNU awk TCP/UDP networking
15.05.
|`- Re: GNU awk TCP/UDP networking
12.04.
+* Re: GNU awk TCP/UDP networking
13.04.
|`* Re: GNU awk TCP/UDP networking
13.04.
| +- Re: GNU awk TCP/UDP networking - fixed
12.04.
| `- Re: GNU awk TCP/UDP networking
12.04.
`- Re: GNU awk TCP/UDP networking
07.04.
* Unicode
08.04.
`* Re: Unicode
08.04.
 `* Re: Unicode
08.04.
  `- Re: Unicode
21.03.
* RS="": summary
22.03.
+* Re: RS="": summary
22.03.
|`* Re: RS="": summary
22.03.
| `* Re: RS="": summary
22.03.
|  `* Re: RS="": summary
23.03.
|   +* Re: RS="": summary
28.03.
|   |`- Re: RS="": summary
23.03.
|   `- Re: RS="": summary
21.03.
`- Re: RS="": summary
20.03.
o Beta release of gawk 5.1.0
19.03.
* In GAWK, is there any difference between RS="" and RS="\n\n+" ?
19.03.
`* Re: In GAWK, is there any difference between RS="" and RS="\n\n+" ?
19.03.
 `* Re: In GAWK, is there any difference between RS="" and RS="\n\n+" ?
19.03.
  `- Re: In GAWK, is there any difference between RS="" and RS="\n\n+" ?
17.03.
* Split file into files with headers
17.03.
`* Re: Split file into files with headers
17.03.
 `* Re: Split file into files with headers
17.03.
  `* Re: Split file into files with headers
17.03.
   `* Re: Split file into files with headers
18.03.
    `* Re: Split file into files with headers
18.03.
     +- Re: Split file into files with headers
18.03.
     `- Re: Split file into files with headers
16.03.
* Idiotic Italian spam posts
17.03.
`* Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
19.03.
 +* Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
22.03.
 |`- Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
19.03.
 +- Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
17.03.
 `* Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
17.03.
  +- Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
17.03.
  `* Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
17.03.
   `* Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
18.03.
    `- Re: Idiotic Italian spam posts
15.03.
o LA TROIACCIA COSTANZA BARRAI PRENDE CAZZI IN CULO DI 30 CM (IN SONY LONDON E NO
14.03.
o É DA ARRESTARE L'AVVOCATO ASSASSINO DANIELE MINOTTI ! É DA ARRESTARE L'AVVOCAT
11.03.
o ARRESTATE L'AVVOCATO ASSASSINO DANIELE MINOTTI! ARRESTATE SUBITO L'AVVOCATO SATA
09.03.
o ARRESTATE L'AVVOCATO ASSASSINO DANIELE MINOTTI! ARRESTATE SUBITO L'AVVOCATO SATA
24.02.
* (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
+* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
|`* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
| `- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
+* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
|`* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
| +- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
| +* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
| |`* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
| | `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
| |  `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
| |   `- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
| `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
|  `- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
+* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
|`* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
| `- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
+* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
|+- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
|`- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
+* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
|+* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
||+- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
26.02.
||`- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
|`* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
| +* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
| |`* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
| | `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
| |  `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
25.02.
| |   `- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
| `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
|  `- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
`* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
 `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
  +- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
  `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
   `* Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
24.02.
    `- Re: (how to) execute a command generated with awk
20.02.
o LA FUTURA PUTTANA MIRTA SALVINI, SI VERGOGNERA' DEL BASTARDO, NAZISTA, ASSASSINO
11.02.
o É PUTTANONA E SATANISTA ASSASSINA: ELISA COGNO DI C RIMINALISSIMA FONDAZIONE FE
11.02.
o Re: KOTLIN
07.02.
o Calculate fugacity coefficent
06.02.
o É PUTTANA E SATANISTA ASSASSINA: ELISA COGNO DI CRI MINALISSIMA EDIL.CO.PEC. SA
02.02.
o [announcement] libfawk 1.2.0 released
01.02.
* Oddity with FS
02.02.
`* Re: Oddity with FS
01.02.
 `- Re: Oddity with FS
17.12.
* Computation on arrays
17.12.
+* Re: Computation on arrays
19.12.
|`- Re: Computation on arrays
16.12.
`- Re: Computation on arrays
03.12.
* The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
12.12.
+* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
17.12.
|+* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
||`* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
12.01.
|| +* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
12.01.
|| |`- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
|| +- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
|| `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
||  `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
||   `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
||    +- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
||    `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
20.12.
||     +* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
20.12.
||     |`* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
20.12.
||     | `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
20.12.
||     |  `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
20.12.
||     |   `- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
||     `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
19.12.
||      `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
20.12.
||       `- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
13.12.
|`- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
03.12.
+- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
03.12.
`* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
05.12.
 `* Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
05.12.
  `- Re: The range expression: A solution to the first/last problem.
15.11.
* Re: Binary distribution of gawkextlib libraries
26.11.
`* Re: Binary distribution of gawkextlib libraries
28.11.
 `- Re: Binary distribution of gawkextlib libraries
14.11.
* Month wise summing
15.11.
+* Re: Month wise summing
17.11.
|`* Re: Month wise summing
18.11.
| `* Re: Month wise summing
20.11.
|  `- Re: Month wise summing
14.11.
+- Re: Month wise summing
14.11.
`- Re: Month wise summing
12.11.
* printf statement
12.11.
`* Re: printf statement
12.11.
 `- Re: printf statement
27.10.
* Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
`* Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
 `* Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
  `- Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
* GAWK readdir
27.10.
`* Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
 +* Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
 |`* Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
 | `- Re: GAWK readdir
27.10.
 `- Re: GAWK readdir
26.10.
* Is there a briefer way to create a set?
27.10.
+* Re: Is there a briefer way to create a set?
26.10.
|`* Re: Is there a briefer way to create a set?
28.11.
| `- Re: Is there a briefer way to create a set?
26.10.
`* Re: Is there a briefer way to create a set?
26.10.
 `* Re: Is there a briefer way to create a set?
26.10.
  `* Re: Is there a briefer way to create a set?
26.10.
   `- Re: Is there a briefer way to create a set?
24.10.
* New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
24.10.
`* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
24.10.
 `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
25.10.
  `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
25.10.
   `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
25.10.
    `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
25.10.
     `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
01.11.
      `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
02.11.
       `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
02.11.
        `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
03.11.
         +* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
05.11.
         |`* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
05.11.
         | +- Company policies (was Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib)
05.11.
         | `- Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
03.11.
         `* Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
04.11.
          +- Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
03.11.
          `- Re: New strptime extension added to gawkextlib
16.10.
o "One True Awk" now supports RS as regexp
12.10.
* Why there is return statement and how it work?
12.10.
`* Re: Why there is return statement and how it work?
17.10.
 `* Re: Why there is return statement and how it work?
17.10.
  +- Re: Why there is return statement and how it work?
17.10.
  `- Re: Why there is return statement and how it work?
09.10.
* Question about GAWK's "filefuncs" extension (stat() function "name" field)
09.10.
`* Re: Question about GAWK's "filefuncs" extension (stat() function "name" field)
10.10.
 +- Re: Question about GAWK's "filefuncs" extension (stat() function "name" field)
10.10.
 `- Re: Question about GAWK's "filefuncs" extension (stat() function "name" field)
08.10.
* Re: nextfile syntax and BEGINFILE/ENDFILE patch
09.10.
`* Re: nextfile syntax and BEGINFILE/ENDFILE patch
09.10.
 `* Re: nextfile syntax and BEGINFILE/ENDFILE patch
09.10.
  `* Re: nextfile syntax and BEGINFILE/ENDFILE patch
10.10.
   `- Re: nextfile syntax and BEGINFILE/ENDFILE patch
06.10.
* Re: my script is not working? Re: Convert rows to columns
11.10.
`- Re: my script is not working? Re: Convert rows to columns
05.10.
* Convert rows to columns
07.10.
+- Re: Convert rows to columns
05.10.
+* Re: Convert rows to columns
07.10.
|`- Re: Convert rows to columns
05.10.
`- Re: Convert rows to columns
05.10.
* awkcard,pdf documentation?
05.10.
`* Re: awkcard,pdf documentation?
06.10.
 `- Re: awkcard,pdf documentation?
03.10.
* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
`* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
 `* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
  +* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
  |+* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
  ||+* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
05.10.
  |||`* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
07.10.
  ||| `* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
08.10.
  |||  `- Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
  ||`* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
  || `- Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
  |`* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
  | `- OT: Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
  `- Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
* fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
+* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
|`* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
04.10.
| +- Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
| `- Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
+- Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
`* Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
03.10.
 `- Re: fawk: a new, minimalistic, embedded AWK dialect
02.10.
* When getline can return -1 (gawk)?
02.10.
`* Re: When getline can return -1 (gawk)?
02.10.
 `* Re: When getline can return -1 (gawk)?
03.10.
  `- Re: When getline can return -1 (gawk)?

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]

   
Add to My Google
My yahoo !
Add to Netvibes