Home | 1001portails | 1001annonces

comp.lang.asm.x86     [Liste des Groupes]   refresh

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Date Sujet  Auteur
17.09.
* Re: How to declare program entry point with NASM?
18.09.
`* Re: How to declare program entry point with NASM?
18.09.
 `- Re: How to declare program entry point with NASM?
13.09.
* CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
16.09.
+- Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
13.09.
+* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
13.09.
|+* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
14.09.
||`* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
14.09.
|| +* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
14.09.
|| |`- Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
14.09.
|| `* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
14.09.
||  `* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
14.09.
||   `- Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
13.09.
|`* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
14.09.
| `* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
15.09.
|  `* Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
15.09.
|   `- Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
13.09.
`- Re: CMP flags going wrong in my emu?
10.09.
o Cryptic Crosswords
08.09.
o Re: Bit Swizzling
08.09.
o lg2k-1
05.09.
* Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
05.09.
`* Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
06.09.
 +* Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
06.09.
 |`* Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
06.09.
 | `* Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
06.09.
 |  +* Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
08.09.
 |  |`* Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
08.09.
 |  | `- Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
06.09.
 |  `- Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
05.09.
 `- Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equivalent abstract model of
04.09.
o Re: Bit Swizzling
03.09.
* Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing
03.09.
`- Re: Transforming "C" into a Turing equivalent language 001 [Providing
02.09.
* Transforming the x86 language into its Turing equivalent 002
03.09.
`- Re: Transforming the x86 language into its Turing equivalent 002
27.08.
* Comparing to zero
27.08.
`* Re: Comparing to zero
28.08.
 +* Re: Comparing to zero
30.08.
 |`- Re: Comparing to zero [test]
27.08.
 `- Re: Comparing to zero
22.08.
* small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
+* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
|`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
| +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| |+* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| ||`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
04.09.
| || +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
07.09.
| || |+* prt nth (was: Re: small asm code (compo?)
07.09.
| || ||`- Re: prt nth (was: Re: small asm code (compo?)
05.09.
| || |`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
05.09.
| || | `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
25.08.
| || `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
09.09.
| ||  +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
10.09.
| ||  |`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
15.09.
| ||  | `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
16.09.
| ||  |  +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
16.09.
| ||  |  |`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
26.09.
| ||  |  | `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
15.09.
| ||  |  `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
16.09.
| ||  |   `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.09.
| ||  |    +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.09.
| ||  |    |`- Re: small asm code (compo?)
16.09.
| ||  |    `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
21.09.
| ||  |     `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
22.09.
| ||  |      `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
26.08.
| ||  `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
| |`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| | +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
25.08.
| | |`- Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| | +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| | |`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| | | `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| | |  `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
25.08.
| | |   `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| | `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| |  +* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| |  |`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
25.08.
| |  | `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
| |  `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
| `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
|  `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
24.08.
|   `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
22.08.
`* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
 +- Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
 `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
  `* Re: small asm code (compo?)
23.08.
   `- Re: small asm code (compo?)
17.08.
* Referring to a segment
18.08.
+* Re: Referring to a segment
21.08.
|`- Re: Referring to a segment
17.08.
`- Re: Referring to a segment
09.08.
* virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
+* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
|+* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
||`* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
|| `* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
||  `* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
||   `* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
||    `* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
||     `- Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
|+* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
||`* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
|| `- Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
|`- Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
10.08.
`* Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
09.08.
 `- Re: virtualbox vcvtsi2sd illegal instruction
04.08.
* Re: Easily convert 16bit asm to 32bit with DEBUGX.COM?
05.08.
+- Re: Easily convert 16bit asm to 32bit with DEBUGX.COM?
04.08.
`- Re: Easily convert 16bit asm to 32bit with DEBUGX.COM?
03.08.
* Re: Easily convert 16bit asm to 32bit with DEBUGX.COM?
04.08.
+- Re: Easily convert 16bit asm to 32bit with DEBUGX.COM?
04.08.
`- Re: Easily convert 16bit asm to 32bit with DEBUGX.COM?
02.06.
o Live register analysis
22.05.
* HLA binary unable to locate its library file.
24.05.
+- Re: HLA binary unable to locate its library file.
22.05.
`* Re: HLA binary unable to locate its library file.
22.05.
 `- Re: HLA binary unable to locate its library file.
13.05.
* Could anyone help me re-writing a function with gcc inline-assembly ?
13.05.
`- Solved
22.04.
* Re: Which freeware assembler would you use on Windows for this source code?
10.05.
`- Re: Which freeware assembler would you use on Windows for this source code?
17.04.
o Diaperglu
13.04.
* Life
13.04.
+- Re: Life
13.04.
`* Re: Life
13.04.
 `* Re: Life
14.04.
  `- Re: Life
09.04.
* Borlands tasm32 v5, calling by pointer and assemble-time checking the provided a
10.04.
`* Re: Borlands tasm32 v5, calling by pointer and assemble-time checking the provided a
10.04.
 `* Re: Borlands tasm32 v5, calling by pointer and assemble-time checking the provided a
11.04.
  `* Re: Borlands tasm32 v5, calling by pointer and assemble-time checking the provided a
11.04.
   `- Re: Borlands tasm32 v5, calling by pointer and assemble-time checking the provided a
01.04.
* Manual for current MASM
04.04.
+- Re: Manual for current MASM
01.04.
+* Re: Manual for current MASM
02.04.
|`* Re: Manual for current MASM
02.04.
| `* Re: Manual for current MASM
03.04.
|  +* Re: Manual for current MASM
03.04.
|  |`- Re: Manual for current MASM
03.04.
|  `* Re: Manual for current MASM
04.04.
|   `* Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|    `* Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|     +* Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|     |`* Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|     | `* Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|     |  `* Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|     |   `* Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|     |    `- Re: Manual for current MASM
05.04.
|     `- Re: Manual for current MASM
01.04.
`- Re: Manual for current MASM
07.03.
* Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
`* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
 `* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
  `* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
   +* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
   |`* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
09.03.
   | `* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
09.03.
   |  +* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
10.03.
   |  |+* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
10.03.
   |  ||+- Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
10.03.
   |  ||`* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
10.03.
   |  || `- Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
09.03.
   |  |+- Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
09.03.
   |  |`- Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
09.03.
   |  `- Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
   `* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
    `* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
     `* Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
08.03.
      `- Re: Why does adding a 49 prefix to this instruction crash?
14.01.
* register pointer to memory
15.01.
+* Re: register pointer to memory
15.01.
|`- Re: register pointer to memory
15.01.
`* Re: register pointer to memory
15.01.
 `* Re: register pointer to memory
16.01.
  `* Re: register pointer to memory
16.01.
   +* Re: register pointer to memory
16.01.
   |`- Re: register pointer to memory
15.01.
   +- Re: register pointer to memory
15.01.
   `- Re: register pointer to memory
28.12.
* org-asm (new asembler for x86)
29.12.
`* Re: org-asm (new asembler for x86)
01.01.
 `* Re: org-asm (new asembler for x86)
02.01.
  `- Re: org-asm (new asembler for x86)
26.12.
* Isn't this anomalous behavior? What can I do?
26.12.
`- Re: Isn't this anomalous behavior? What can I do?
26.12.
* Isn't this anomalous behavior? What can I do?
26.12.
+* Re: Isn't this anomalous behavior? What can I do?
27.12.
|`- Re: Isn't this anomalous behavior? What can I do?
26.12.
`* Re: Isn't this anomalous behavior? What can I do?
18.01.
 `- Re: Isn't this anomalous behavior? What can I do?
18.12.
o Sokoban
15.12.
* can't read memory at 0xb8000
16.12.
+* Re: can't read memory at 0xb8000
15.12.
|`- Re: can't read memory at 0xb8000
16.12.
+- Re: can't read memory at 0xb8000
16.12.
`* PROBLEM SOLVED
16.12.
 `- Re: PROBLEM SOLVED
13.12.
* IA32_TSC_AUX_MSR
14.12.
`* Re: IA32_TSC_AUX_MSR
15.12.
 `* Re: IA32_TSC_AUX_MSR
18.12.
  `- Re: IA32_TSC_AUX_MSR
04.12.
o Test
04.12.
* using rep movsw instruction to move text mode screen
05.12.
+- Re: using rep movsw instruction to move text mode screen
05.12.
`* Re: using rep movsw instruction to move text mode screen
13.12.
 `- Re: using rep movsw instruction to move text mode screen
01.12.
* EXE not found
04.12.
+* Re: EXE not found
04.12.
|`- Re: EXE not found
02.12.
`* Re: EXE not found
02.12.
 `- Re: EXE not found
26.11.
* simple ASM prog segfault
26.11.
+- Re: simple ASM prog segfault
26.11.
`- Re: simple ASM prog segfault
19.11.
* using shrd instruction in 16-bit code
19.11.
`- Re: using shrd instruction in 16-bit code
27.10.
* Why is this assembly progarm not quitting on ESC?
27.10.
`* Re: Why is this assembly progarm not quitting on ESC?
28.10.
 `* Re: Why is this assembly progarm not quitting on ESC?
28.10.
  `- Re: Why is this assembly progarm not quitting on ESC?
27.10.
o Why is this assembly program not quitting on ESC?
26.10.
o Could not open hw.hla
20.10.
* FMA4 on Matisse?
21.10.
+* Re: FMA4 on Matisse?
21.10.
|`- Re: FMA4 on Matisse?
20.10.
`- Re: FMA4 on Matisse?
15.10.
o Re: RTM-question

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

   
Add to My Google
My yahoo !
Add to Netvibes